Critical Analysis Form free essay sample

The example of bias in this article is that this author mentions in paragraph 5, that regardless oh her divorce, she has high functioning children of her own. 3 Identify any areas that are vague or ambiguous. If none exist, explain how you determined this. The author is being vague when she compares the rate of teen suicide to rollerblading. 4 Do you find the source credible? Explain your reasoning. I don’t find this source very credible because she writes mainly from opinion and doesn’t back up her statements with facts. 5 Identify and name any rhetorical devices used by the author.If none exist, explain how you determined this. The author downplays a study in paragraph 3 whit her use of, â€Å"but† where she discredits a study on negative affects on divorce. 6 Identify and name any fallacies used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this. The author uses the fallacy, â€Å"With the appeal to fear† in her statement â€Å"but if divorce itself hasn’t reduced America’s youth to emotional cripples, then the efforts to restrict it undoubtedly will. † Here, she is stating that if restrict divorce then we will definitely be worse off. 7 State one argument made by the author. The alleged psyche-scarring affects of divorce are grossly exaggerated† 8 Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument. The premises is that the affect of divorce is exaggerated and the conclusion is that reform should improve the quality of divorces and that adults should be more responsible divorcees for the sake of the children. 9 Is the author’s argument valid or invalid, sound or unsound, strong or weak? Explain how you determined this. The author’s argument is valid because it could be a true statement, but it is unsound because she doesn’t have a lot of facts to back it up.It is a weak argument because it is mainly her opinion she is stating and not a fact. 10 Does the author use moral reasoning? If not, explain how you determined this. I don’t believe that the author used moral reasoning for her argument because it wasn’t an issue of her moral values rather it was an issue of divorce being exaggerated. It is more of an opinion and didn’t have anything to do with her moral values. Source 2 Title and Citation: Divorce Harms Children Divorce Harms Children. Steven Waldman. Opposing Viewpoints: Child Welfare. Ed. Carol Wekesser.San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 1998 1 Identify the principal issue presented by the source. Divorce is harmful to children. 2 Identify any examples of bias presented by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this. There are no examples of bias presented by the author. The author is presenting the argument and the counter argument. 3 Identify any areas that are vague or ambiguous. If none exist, explain how you determined this. The authors argument of divorce having a harmful affect on children is vague throughout the article because he touches on the counterargument so often. Do you find the source credible? Explain your reasoning. Yes, because the author shows both sides of the arguments and he shows a lot of researched facts. 5 Identify and name any rhetorical devices used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this. The author rationalizes in paragraph 8 when he states that if Bill Clinton screwing around on his wife a legitimate character issue then so was Ronald Reagan’s divorce to Jane Wyman after they had kids. 6 Identify and name any fallacies used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this. The author uses slippery slope in paragraph 5 when he states that children from divorced parents will most likely end up doing poorly in school, could end up in a life of crime, could become depressed, to eventually divorce. 7 State one argument made by the author. â€Å"Many children are severely harmed when their parents divorce. † 8 Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument. The premises is that children are harmed when parents divorce and the conclusion is that parent’s should make sure that divorce is really necessary and the they should put the needs of their children first. 9Is the author’s argument valid or invalid, sound or unsound, strong or weak? Explain how you determined this. The author’s argument is valid and sound. It is a strong argument because there are many facts and studies to prove this argument. 10 Does the author use moral reasoning? If not, explain how you determined this. The author does not use moral reasoning. The author doesn’t state what he believes is right or wrong through his moral values, but states more facts and affects of divorce. Source 3 Title and Citation: Internet Use Decreases Social Interaction Internet Use Decreases Social Interaction. Norman H.Nie and Lutz Erbring. Opposing Viewpoints: The Internet. Ed. James D. Torr. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2005. 1 Identify the principal issue presented by the source. The author states that too much internet use detracts from people’s social lives. 2 Identify any examples of bias presented by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this. The author is not biased in this article because he is taking his information from actual research and surveys. 3 Identify any areas that are vague or ambiguous. If none exist, explain how you determined this. There are no areas that are vague and or ambiguous.The author simply states facts and is very clear in what he is talking about. 4 Do you find the source credible? Explain your reasoning. I believe that the source is credible. The author is a professor of political science and director of Quantitative Study. So all of the information is available to him through the research that was conducted and through the surveys. 5 Identify and name any rhetorical devices used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this. The rhetorical device the author uses is innuendo when she is referring to internet users. 6 Identify and name any fallacies used by the author.If none exist, explain how you determined this. The fallacy used by the author is false dilemma. If the internet is not monitored for too much use then it will invade the home by allowing us to work at home now and cutting into family time. 7 State one argument made by the author. The internet is an individual activity. 8 Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument. The premises is that using the internet is decreasing the amount of social interaction. The conclusion is that internet use should be monitored carefully to prevent a decrease in social interaction. 9Is the author’s argument valid or invalid, sound or unsound, strong or weak? Explain how you determined this. The author’s argument is valid because it could be true that internet use detracts from personal social interaction. It is unsound because it is not necessarily true that the internet decreases social interaction. The argument is strong because it supports its conclusion. 10 Does the author use moral reasoning? If not, explain how you determined this. No, the author does not use moral reasoning, but he uses his reasoning from the information gathered from surveys and research. Source 4 Title and Citation: The Internet Connects PeopleThe Internet Connects People. Jeffrey Boase et al. Opposing Viewpoints: Technology and Society. Ed. David Haugen and Susan Musser. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2007. 1 Identify the principal issue presented by the source. People are able to connect via the internet from all over the world. 2 Identify any examples of bias presented by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this. I don’t believe that there are any biases because the author is relaying the information he got from comparing 2 surveys. 3 Identify any areas that are vague or ambiguous. If none exist, explain how you determined this. In paragraph 3 the author is a little vague when he uses the word, â€Å"It† in replace of the internet. One might be confused and not know what he is talking about. 4 Do you find the source credible? Explain your reasoning. I do find this source credible. The author’s findings are from surveys conducted by nonprofit company that conducts research of the internet. 5 Identify and name any rhetorical devices used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this. The author is not using any rhetorical devices because he is stating information from surveys. He is not persuading the reader to believe that the internet connects people. Identify and name any fallacies used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this. I don’t find any fallacies used by the author because for the same reason there are no rhetorical devices he is stating the findings from the surveys. 7 State one argument made by the author. The internet has become a part of everyday life. 8 Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument. People are able to socialize online from any part of the world and connect with people in their networks. The conclusion is the people are using the internet to face life-changing events.IE: career training, aiding in medical conditions, purchasing a home, choosing a school, etc. 9 Is the author’s argument valid or invalid, sound or unsound, strong or weak? Explain how you determined this. The author’s argument is valid because it can be true that the internet has become a part of everyday life. It is unsound because not everybody has a computer. The argument is strong because the conclusion supports the argument. 10 Does the author use moral reasoning? If not, explain how you determined this. The author does not use moral reasoning. He is using information gathered from surveys.